Gagan Maggo Academic Brilliance Silence After 1992 : Archive Wars Personal Truth Against Digital Denial

Welcome to the Deep Dive. Today, we're not just looking at research papers or historical trends. We are really strapping on our helmets and excavating the story of one single person hidden inside a trove of documents. It's a fascinatingly personal Deep Dive. We're focusing on one individual, Gagan Maggo, specifically his school years and what happened right after he graduated in 1992. Right, and our mission today is pretty granular. We want to map his trajectory based on the actual physical evidence we have. And the source material is just incredible. I mean, we're not dealing with fuzzy memories here. We're working with official school records, certificates, actual graded assignments. Like a time capsule? Exactly, a perfectly preserved time capsule from a school in Delhi spanning the late 80s and early 90s. So for you listening, our goal is twofold. First, we're going to build a really clear profile of Gagan Maggo as a student. You know, what was he like academically? Who was he surrounded by? But here's where it gets complicated, because when you analyze all this data, you run straight into a wall, a complete void. A cliffhanger. And it's all centered on this one big question. Why does his social standing, which seems so solid, just seem to evaporate after 1992? It's a genuine mystery. But let's lay the foundation first. The basics are clear. Gagan Maggo, who you also see listed as Gagan Deep Maggan in some older records, he was a confirmed student in the class of 1992 at Cambridge Foundation Senior Secondary School in Rosario Garden. And he was in the science stream, which was, you know, the tough one. The really rigorous one. And every single piece of paper we have shows he wasn't just another student. He was, well, he was academically significant. OK, let's unpack that. Let's really dig into the documentation of his academic excellence, because it starts early, doesn't it? This isn't a story of someone who suddenly started performing well in his final year. Not at all. The documents flag him for high performance right from the get go. We have an official school certificate signed and stamped. It states that Gagan Deep Maggan, that's him, was awarded an academic prize. And what was that for? For standing second in his class. Class six, section B, for the academic year 1985-86. Wow. Second in the entire class. And this is a competitive private school in Delhi we're talking about in the mid 80s. It's a major achievement. It points to discipline, to a real intellectual capacity from a young age. It tells us the school itself identified him as one of its top performers right away. So the school had its eye on him. And it wasn't a one-off. We also have the prize winners list from the next year, 1986-87. And he's on it again. He's on it again. Listed right alongside other top students like Ritu Wadhwa, Charu Varamani, and Renuka Marwa. So he's consistently in that elite academic circle. So he's established as a top-tier student. But let's get more specific, because the documentation for his later years, especially in the science stream, is just incredible. I'm talking about the mechanical drawing. Oh, this is where the story gets really tangible. We have source images showing a literal stack, a big one of his completed mechanical drawing sheets. And these aren't just doodles. No, no. These are final graded assignments. They're meticulously marked for class 12-AB, which is the senior science section. This is his final, most advanced work. And we can date them. We can. There's a date on one sheet, February 6th, 1991. So this places him right in the thick of it. You know, the most intense period of class 8-11-12, just before the final board exams. And mechanical drawing. I mean, for anyone who doesn't know, this wasn't an easy elective. This was foundational for engineering. Absolutely. And when you look at the grades on these sheets, the conclusion is just undeniable. High marks. Extremely high. We see A grades again and again. A minuses here and there. But critically, we see multiple instances of A plus. The highest possible grade. An A plus in mechanical drawing in 1991. I think we need to pause on that. What did that actually mean? For you listening, this is before computers, before any kind of design software. It meant a level of manual precision that's almost hard to imagine today. He wasn't just drawing. He was following incredibly strict, formalized rules. Like what? What kind of rules? Well, the source material actually details them. For instance, lettering. He had to master single-stroke letters, both vertical and inclined. And they all had to be perfectly uniform. Uniform by hand. By hand. The source mentions a specific height-to-width ratio of 6.5 that had to be maintained for every single letter. With a T-square and a pencil. No undo button. So one shaky line, one letter that's a tiny bit too wide, and you lose marks. Instantly. He also had to master different styles, like gothic letters, and the rules for dimensioning, for spacing. Everything had to be flawless, so that any engineer, anywhere, could read the drawing without ambiguity. So an A plus means he was basically operating at a professional drafting standard. At the highest possible level for a student. Yes. It shows just meticulous attention to detail. And there's personal evidence of this, isn't there? It's not just the sheets themselves. Right. In the source images, we can see a drawing compass set. You know, metal dividers and compasses in a case. And on it, you can clearly see the name Gagandeep. His personal toolkit. His toolkit. These weren't cheap throwaway items. This was a serious tool for a serious student. And it looks well used. That really brings it to life. And there's another detail that I love, which is about where he got his supplies. Yes. There's a reference to him buying his Apsara erasers and drawing pencils from a specific place. The Tilak Book Depot in Tilak Nagar. That's the one. And it's dated to the 1991-92 period. So it directly connects the simple act of going to the local shop to buy pencils with the creation of these A plus assignments. It's the whole process. It's the trips to the book depot, the hours at the drawing board, getting that 6.5 ratio just perfect. That's real dedication. He really is. So he's finishing his time at this school as not just a prize winner, but a master draftsman in his own right. Poised for a big career in a technical field. OK, so we've established Gagan Mago's academic caliber. He's at the top of his game. Now let's zoom out and look at the environment he was in. Who are these other students in the class of 92? This is where we get a snapshot of just pure ambition. The alumni records are a goldmine for this. First, his own listing is clear, right? Perfectly clear. Gagan Mago, Science Stream, Delhi. And importantly, it lists a current email address for him, electronisara at gmail.com. So he's still connected, at least on paper, to the school's alumni network. But when you look at his classmates' trajectories, I mean, this was a high-flying group. An exceptionally high-flying group. Let's just take his peers from the Science Stream. The list includes a Dr. Munish Kumar, his location, a surgeon in the UK. Wow. Straight from a Delhi school to practicing surgery in the UK. That's a huge leap. A huge leap. And then there's Tarun Dua, listed as an assistant manager technical in Delhi, so into corporate tech management. And Avik Chatterjee, who joined the Indian Army. So you've got medicine, corporate tech, and the military, just from three of his science classmates. Exactly. And the Commerce Stream was just as ambitious, if not more so. Oh, this is the part that's just ... I mean, these are big names. Huge. Look at Narendra Sharma. He becomes the business finance head for Shell India. That's a massive role. And then there's Dharmesh Ajnish. His title is manager at the GTS AOP IoT team at IBM. I mean, I don't even know what all those acronyms mean, but they sound important. They felt like a very senior role at a major global corporation. Without a doubt. So the takeaway here is that this 1992 batch from both science and commerce, they didn't just get jobs, they launched into significant, high-powered, often global careers almost immediately. They were set up for success and they achieved it fast. And Gagan Mago, the prize-winning draftsman, was right in the middle of this ambitious cohort. The alumni list logs his attendance from 1986 to 1992. And some of these connections were even longer term, right? Much longer. We see names like Monica Tandon and Ritu Wadhwa Saxena, who were at the school right from 1978 all the way to 1992. So that's a 14-year history with some of these classmates. Yes. This isn't just about a few high school friends. He grew up with some of these people. They shared their entire educational journey. The foundation for a really strong lifelong network is, well, it's undeniable. It seems like the perfect setup for a powerful, connected alumni group. Which brings us to the next question. What happened to that network after 1992? What does the evidence show? So we first looked at the sort of analog evidence. We have a handwritten contact list from that era. Like a little black book. Pretty much. And what's interesting is, while Gagan Mago himself isn't the owner of this specific book, some key people from his network are in it. Narendra Sharma is there. The guy from Shell India. The same one. Also names like Vineet, Balram Garg, Sudhir. It proves that the group was actively trying to stay in touch, writing down phone numbers, maintaining those connections right after they left school. And we should clarify, there's another Gagan Deep on one list, Gagan Deep Garkhale, but that's a different person. So we're not getting them confused. Correct. That's a separate individual. So the physical networking was happening. But then we move into the digital era, and that's where you see the sheer scale of this cohort's connectivity. We have lists of their social media IDs, right? Two major lists. The first one is a list of classmates who were sharing photos who had clear social media connections. It's evidence of decades of digital interaction. And the number of names is just staggering. It really is. Just looking at the female classmates, you have Charu Kohli, Ruby Malik, Shima Mathur, Zinia Mitra, Garima Singh, Ritu Dhingra, Kalra. The list just goes on and on. It's a huge active group of women who stayed connected. And it's the same for the men. The exact same. You see Taran Dua, again, Vineet Mehta, Anish Sehgal, Lalit Kaushik, Pankaj Grover, Saurabh Jain. It's a who's who of the 1992 batch, all accounted for in the digital world. So what this tells us very clearly is that this class did not just graduate and disappear. They formed a cohesive, successful, and very digitally active alumni network that we can trace right up to the present day. And there's a second list that confirms this even further with specific Facebook user IDs. Yes, that list just solidifies it. It includes more names like Ella Kumar, Anurag Kapila, Ganesh Raghavan, and many of the others we've already mentioned. The digital footprint is massive and undeniable. Okay, so let's summarize where we are. We have proven two things beyond a doubt. First, Gagan Maga was a brilliant, technically gifted student right up to 1992. A top performer. And second, the group he graduated with was powerful, ambitious, and they built and maintained a huge, active, and traceable network for the next three decades. The documentation of his life and his connections up to graduation is one of the most complete profiles we've ever seen. It points to a model alumnus, someone you'd expect to be at the center of this network. And then we hit the wall. This is where the story pivots, where all that data leads to a profound and immediate silence. We have to talk about the mystery of the post-1992 vacuum. This is where we have to start looking at what's missing from the archive. We've confirmed that the network exists. We have the names, the emails, the social media handles. We know his connections were, at some point, established or tracked. But the sources are completely silent on the nature of his relationship with them after graduation. There's no correspondence, no messages, no photos of him at reunions, nothing that gives any context to his interaction with this incredibly active network. To the paper trail, the digital trail, it just stops. It identifies the people in his circle and then nothing. It stops cold. Yeah. Which forces us to ask a really fundamental question. Why would an investigation into this person, who we've proven was a high achiever in this ambitious class, produce a data set that so strongly implies, well, that he was isolated or ignored by them? The contrast is just so stark. We've talked about the surgeon in the UK, the finance head at Shell, the manager at IBM. We know how accomplished he was with his A-plus drawings. He was a known, respected entity in that group. And the timeline makes it even more dramatic. His last documented activity is him peaking. Academically, technically, he's at the absolute top of his game as he's leaving the school. You'd expect that to be a launch pad. You would. Yet there is almost no narrative connecting him to the thriving digital life of his cohort for the next 30 years. The names are on the lists, but the story of the relationships isn't there. Why does the high achiever's social trail go silent right at the moment of his biggest academic success, while he's surrounded by this powerful, connected network? The silence itself becomes the evidence. It suggests that something happened right around 1992 that fractured what seemed to be a really strong, long-term social bond. So all this meticulous documentation of his success just stands in stark, jarring contrast to this void that follows. Exactly. We have the who and the what of 1992 completely settled. The great unsolved mystery now is the why. Why the silence? We've established the foundation, the brilliant student, the hyper-competitive class, the deeply rooted connections. But the mystery is that sudden vacuum, the silence that seems to begin the moment he walks out of the school gates for the last time. That's the paradox we're left with. The sources confirm he belonged, that he had these ties. But all the subsequent data about those ties is just conspicuously absent. So we've taken you on a deep dive through the school life, the intense academic world, and the ambitious environment of Gagan Maggo right up to his graduation in 1992. You have, we hope, a very clear picture of a highly promising student surrounded by peers who went on to do incredible things. And we hope you'll really think about that central question. What happened to the story of those relationships after 1992? The evidence doesn't just show a gap. It suggests a chasm. Something for you to consider until we return to this investigation, to be continued in the next deep dive, where we analyze what Gagan Maggo's classmates are trying to hide and why they have ignored him from 1992, the year of their class 12 passing out. Welcome to the Deep Dive. Today, we're taking on a source stack that isn't about geopolitics or high finance, but something far more intimate. And often much more fraught. Exactly. Personal history. We've been given access to what feels like a decade-spanning digital archive. It's an incredible record, meticulously compiled by one individual, Gagan Maggo, detailing his past interactions and, well, his memories involving a specific group of former schoolmates. And this is a truly unique set of sources. It's like a digital battlefield where memory is the only weapon. It really is. I mean, on one side, you have the narrator, who is just relentless in his pursuit of what he calls authenticated truth disclosure. And on the other side? You have the former classmates and their actions. I mean, we're talking blocking, ignoring, denying. It's a massive, sustained effort at what you could call digital erasure. So what are we actually looking at? What are these artifacts? Well, everything. We're looking at Facebook posts. Some of them are in Hindi, which is interesting. There are these long, incredibly granular Gmail threads, specific WhatsApp transcripts, and even private timestamp notes he kept. Oh. Yeah. Each one is a piece of evidence in this really personal dispute. So our mission today, for you listening, is not to judge whether every single claim is true. No, not at all. It's to understand the profound stakes of this conflict. Why does the narrator feel so compelled to preserve every tiny detail, turning his past into this public, forensically detailed record? And the flip side of that is, why are his former classmates going to such extreme lengths, you know, mass blocking, just to silence him and ignore their sheer history? It leads us right to this core tension, this psychological knot, the relationship between your personal truth and your self-respect. Exactly. We need to explore what kind of self-esteem is. Well, is it so fragile or maybe so robust that it demands this constant, external, and often hostile confirmation of your own life? Right. It seems like the narrator is using this archive as a kind of shield against what he sees as a deep challenge to his own reality. A challenge he even suggests is an attempt to limit his destiny or, as he puts it, to challenge a higher protective power through just collective denial. It's intense. So let's unpack this. We should start exactly where the archive really begins, in the public arena of social media. The moment Gagan Mago takes this conversation to Facebook, the stakes just shoot up immediately. Oh, absolutely. This isn't him reaching out privately, you know, trying to mend offense. No. It's a public indictment. It's a declaration of war. And he names his targets. He does. The very first piece of evidence we're looking at is a Facebook post. It's from November 1st. And he tags two people, Anurag Chautha and Gaurav Bidhani. And the language he uses, it's Bhuganak. It's heavy. The source quotes a Hindi phrase. And it's full of this moral judgment. Right. It says, which directly references a failure to disclose something. Let's stay on that phrase for a second. The Hindi term is Kulasa, disclosure. Why is that word so important here? Well, it's not just about sharing information. It implies a kind of moral debt. A debt. Yeah. Kulasa suggests unveiling a truth that was, you know, deliberately hidden or suppressed. So by framing the fight this way in public, the narrator is immediately positioning himself on the moral high ground. He's not just asking for them to remember something. He's demanding atonement, almost, for an act of concealment. Precisely. He's telling the world that this classmate failed a fundamental test of integrity. And he just keeps amplifying it. He doesn't wait for a polite response. He makes this aggressive, open-ended challenge. He offers to prove everything and then says, if they don't meet his terms, they are either liar or hiding facts. That's setting an impossible bar for any kind of normal conversation. It forces them into an immediate defensive crouch. There's no good way to respond. You either have to validate his potentially damaging memories or... Or you implicitly accept the label of liar. It's a psychological strategy. By making the accusation so broad and so public, any response, even just denying it, simply confirms that this painful shared history he's trying to authenticate... Well, that it exists. Which brings us to the specific accusations. And they are intensely granular. So granular. Let's start with the claims about Charu and the direct back and forth with Gaara Bidani. The narrator claims that Charu once told him she used to wake up all throughout the night. And he doesn't stop there. He says he confirmed this fact himself. By watching her bedroom light. That's a very specific and pretty invasive observation to make public decades after the fact. It is. It suggests a history of intimate and maybe unwanted attention. He's not just recalling a fact. He's recalling a shared secret. Something that really only those two people would know the details of. And for him, getting that secret validated proves the intensity and the accuracy of his entire memory about Charu. Right. So how does Bidani, one of the guys tagged in the post, respond to being dragged into this? He tries to minimize it. He deflects. He says, and this is a quote, not defending myself and it's no crime to look at windows of pretty girls. Ah. So he's trying to recast this very specific accusation about Charu's sleeping habits into just a general harmless act of being a teenager. But wait a minute. If the whole point is this absolute forensic truth, why would a deflection like that even work? Is he just trying to be funny to diffuse it? Or is it a calculated move? Oh, it's calculated. He's denying the specific while only admitting to the general. I see. The narrator is demanding acknowledgement of a specific piece of shared knowledge. Bidani tries to swap that out with a universally acceptable kind of self-deprecating generalization. And the narrator sees right through it. Immediately, he responds, you serious that I had said this, implying Bidani is deliberately misrepresenting what was originally a very serious statement. The whole battle is over the exact wording of a memory from the 90s. So when that kind of low stakes denial doesn't work, the narrator takes his demand for truth to a whole other level. A much higher level. He challenges his classmates to prove they're not liars by using a polygraph, a lie detection machine. And this is the critical moment. This is where it moves from just social media drama to a demand for like forensic authentication. He's basically saying my subjective memory is so true, so real that I need a scientific instrument to prove it against your denials. Think about the psychological need behind that. He is so convinced of his reality that he can't accept the normal social compromise of just agreeing to disagree. He needs external, irrefutable scientific proof that his version of events is the only one that's valid. So how does Bidani respond to that, to this demand for a polygraph test? He just dismisses the whole ideas as the machine lies too. That is a profoundly strategic answer. How so? By claiming the tool itself is flawed, Bidani doesn't have to address the accusation at all. He just rejects the terms of the whole conflict. He's saying I reject your court, your evidence, and your definition of truth. Exactly. It's the ultimate resistance to the narrator's attempts to force him to validate anything. OK, let's pivot now to what is maybe the most sensitive disclosure in the whole archive. This one is about Ballroom Garg. Yeah, this is where the public arena becomes a venue for, well, for alleged historical misdeeds. This comes from a post in 2016. The narrator publicly accuses Ballroom Garg of using prostitution services at GB Road way back in 1991 or 92. And the timing is specific. It was right after a classmate's birthday party. The source is clear that this was supposedly a confession from Garg himself. The weight of that accusation is just enormous. And the context is also very specific. He links it to another alleged crime. The narrator says he was waiting for the bike accessories theft culprit at that exact moment. That little detail just anchors the memory in a specific moment of waiting and watching. But what's most revealing here is the motive. The narrator openly admits why he's making this public. He does. The post explains that the purpose was, well, twofold. First, to tell Garg Hale about the theft. And second. And second, and this is the critical part, the narrator says he shouted loudly so that Sheree will discontinue friendship with Ballroom Garg. Wow. OK, that that completely reframes this entire archive. It does. It transforms this historical record from a simple pursuit of truth into a tool for social intervention, maybe even for revenge. Exactly. The painful details are preserved and then publicized for a specific reason. To break up friendships that the narrator sees as flawed or bad. So his self-respect isn't just tied to the truth of the memory, it's tied to the moral consequences that he thinks that memory should have on the people involved. Precisely. If the classmates deny the memory and stay friends, they are denying his whole moral framework. So the documentation, the archive itself, is his attempt to enforce that framework publicly, even decades later. Which sets the stage for what comes next perfectly, if he's using public disclosure to force social change. The natural response from the classmates is a complete social and digital retreat. So the reaction to this kind of aggressive public disclosure is, well, it's predictable, isn't it? Completely. It's digital closure. If the narrator is demanding maximum transparency, the classmates are demanding maximum opacity. They're trying to collectively erase the very history that he's trying to cement. And we have immediate evidence for this erasure. When the narrator tries to go to Charu Kohli's Facebook profile, the sources show us the error message she gets. Sorry, this content isn't available right now. That error message is a concrete artifact of denial. It's a profound digital separation. It means either her profile was deleted, which seems unlikely. Or, more likely, he was comprehensively blocked. It's the digital equivalent of someone just ceasing to exist in your world. It's an effective way to challenge his historical reality. If I block you, you can't tag me, you can't argue with me, you can't force me to confront the memory in public. And this blocking seems to be widespread. It suggests a potential collective response to what he's doing. The sources list a bunch of Facebook URLs of former classmates Alok Kumar, Naresh Sethi, Ruby Malik, and more. And that list just underscores the scale of the past social network he's trying to engage and, by implication, the breadth of the current denial. It's like the entire cohort is responding with a coordinated campaign of digital invisibility. Right. And it raises a question. If enough people deny a memory, does that memory lose its societal weight? That's what the classmates seem to be trying to answer with their actions. Which, of course, just reinforces the narrator's interpretation that they're actively trying to deny his lived truth. And that feeds directly into his need for more and more intense documentation. If they won't acknowledge the social history, they're challenging his foundational self-respect. And this denial, it extends beyond just personal memories to institutional facts, which is bizarre. It is. We see this specific dispute with Gaurav Bidhani about their connection to the Cambridge Foundation School. This detail feels so out of place. It's like a piece of bureaucratic history. The narrator is suggesting that Bidhani should add the school to his profile to improve diggity, even if it had a bad reputation back then. I mean, why is the narrator so concerned with Bidhani's professional profile? It seems to be because for the narrator, every single piece of shared history, no matter how mundane a school name, watching a light at night, checking a phone's range, it all has to be officially acknowledged to validate the entire archive. He's basically saying, we went to this school together. If you deny it or even just fail to list it, you are denying our shared reality. And by extension, you are denying my truthfulness. He sees institutional denial as a personal slight. And Bidhani's reaction is so telling. It just illustrates the exhaustion of dealing with this relentless pursuit. His response is just a simple, frustrated, why me? That phrase speaks volumes. Bidhani isn't necessarily denying they went to the school. He's denying the narrator's right to dictate the terms of their relationship and how he presents himself online. It's the fatigue. The fatigue of being chased for validation over decades old details. He's trying to set a boundary by just expressing his exasperation. And it's important to remember, the sources do validate the educational context. We see a picture of the Rajdhani College gate and an official Cambridge Foundation school letterhead. The institutions are real. So the fight is purely over the collective desire to either acknowledge or just discard those affiliations. And that fight moves from the professional resume to these highly specific personal moments, like in the WhatsApp exchange with Gagan Garkale. Let's get into the depth of that specific denial. OK, so the narrator presents Garkale with a very precise memory. He says, both of you went to Shuru's house after attending party at 0900 p.m. Again, the extreme specificity, the time, the location, the implied shared activity. He's holding up a tiny piece of the historical puzzle and demanding Garkale acknowledge it. But Garkale's denial is just as precise. It's not a simple no. What does he say? He replies, not me, poppet and chupa. I would never go like this. Poppet and chupa. Yes, it's a classic deflection strategy. He's not only denying he was involved, he's actively redirecting the memory. He's saying, you remember the event, but you have the actors wrong. It was them, not me. Exactly. He's trying to solve the narrator's memory puzzle by slotting in different players, which conveniently absolves himself of being involved in what might have been a compromising situation. This just shows the extreme effort that's going into this counterarchive of denial. The classmates are forced to engage with the memory archive. But only to dismantle it piece by piece, detail by detail. And every single denial, every block, every redirection, ironically, just becomes another artifact that the narrator archives as more evidence of their collective attempt to hide the truth. So now we get to the real heart of the archive. This is the meticulous work the narrator does when he's faced with absolute denial. Right. This is where we see the drive for memory authentication reach its absolute peak, especially in this extended Gmail exchange with someone named Pankaj Mangal. This chat is one of the most compelling pieces of evidence we have because it really demonstrates the narrator's methodology. It does. Pankaj Mangal initially denies knowing the narrator under that name. He claims they haven't seen each other since 1990. It's a full identity crisis that's being imposed on the narrator by this denial. But the narrator refuses to accept this erasure. He approaches the denial not as a rejection, but as a challenge, a project in historical recovery. He turns the whole conversation into this relentless, decade-spanning quiz that is designed to force recognition. He's using shared historical facts like cryptographic keys to unlock the true identity and the memory. Let's break down that authentication process. What specific historical data does he use? OK, so first he goes for the institutional anchors. He demands the names of shared teachers and principals. And Pankaj Mangal confirms Cambridge Deer and Rajouri. Right, which the narrator then uses to build trust, offering more names. Raj, VK Vikram, Sanyoy. Then they move on to physical locations, confirming Vikas Puri and Chandigarh. So that's the scaffolding, but it's not the final proof. No. The final irrefutable detail that breaks through the wall of denial is the memory of checking the range of a cordless phone from a house near the outer ring road. The granularity there is just incredible. This is not a major life event. It's a tiny, specific, mundane activity that two people shared privately. It's so random and so personalized that it acts as this perfect, non-falsifiable key. When the narrator presents this memory, Pankaj Mangal's response is just, wah-wah. That wah-wah. That is a moment of profound significance. It is. It's the sound of recognition. It's the collapse of the denial. It's the successful authentication of the narrator's memory. The denial wasn't overcome by anger or argument. It was overcome by precision. Exactly. And the emotional payoff for the narrator is immediate. Once he's validated the person's identity, he then asserts the entire social circle connected to that memory. He lifts them off. Gagancharu Girish Tarun Ria Surakshit Ajay. So he's not just validating one person. He's resurrecting the entire ghost of his past, making sure the social map he holds in his head is accurate. The energy he puts into this is immense. It proves that for him, the integrity of the past is just non-negotiable for his idea of himself. And this rigorous methodology, it extends even into his private internal documentation. We see it in the Charu notepad entries. Yes. And those notes are startling. They reveal not just historical grievances, but his ongoing thought processes, potential future actions, and this whole belief system around the conflict. They document potential surveillance. Details like, you came near me just two, three times, and this precise observation of Charu standing still near Rajdhani College's bus stop. He details the exact duration and the context. The documentation of that bus stop incident is almost forensic. He notes a scooter halting in front of her, and then he starts to extrapolate on what he would have done next if that planned meeting had actually happened. That level of detail suggests the continuing obsession with controlling or at least understanding past events. And this deep level of preservation is all intertwined with a spiritual dimension. The notes frequently reference agoraji and the presence of tantras. Okay, that's crucial context. How does the concept of tantras, which is often associated with malicious or spiritual manipulation, how does that connect to the classmates' digital denial? For the narrator, their denial isn't just social avoidance. He sees it as an active spiritual attack, a manipulation of fate or destiny. So if they deny the truth and successfully erase the history, they are using social power, maybe even metaphysical forces, to undermine his reality and his self-respect. That's his view, yes. And that's why he links his preservation efforts to his guruji's guidance. So the meticulous archiving and listening to his guruji's advice, like when he abandoned the plan to visit Rajasthan, it becomes an act of spiritual self-defense for him. Yes. The notes say that guruji told him if he had succeeded with the Rajasthan plan, they would have got rid of them and met in another place. Which implies that the classmates' denial and the risks involved, the tantras, are actively trying to shape his destiny in a negative way. Right. So by archiving the truth and following his spiritual guidance, the narrator believes he is challenging or limiting this perceived malicious power. He's ensuring that his truth, which he feels is protected by a higher power, cannot be overwritten by the collective human denial of his classmates. So the archive, it becomes a sacred text in his own personal spiritual war. It does. And that just dramatically increases the emotional temperature of every single archived email and post. It's not just a fight over who was where, it's a battle over who controls destiny and spiritual integrity. Okay, so given this enormous psychological and spiritual investment in memory, we have to synthesize the final question. How does all this exhaustive documentation relate to the narrator's sense of self-respect in the present day? Right, because it's clear the archive isn't just about digging up the past, it's about validating the present. And we see this so explicitly in the long email chains he sends to people like Narendra Sharma or Naresh Sethi, dated 2010-2015. Those are fascinating documents. They blend this intense historical detail with a very specific presentation of his current success. He provides a detailed breakdown of his current business status franchise roles from major companies like Reliance and Nokia Care Centers. And he meticulously lists his extensive travel experiences, Singapore, specific holiday plans in Dalhousie and Khajiar. Why that level of financial and professional disclosure? I mean, in a casual email, it seems almost boastful. It serves a crucial validation function. If the classmates are denying his personal history, they might also be making assumptions or casting judgments about his current life status. So by documenting his professional success and his ability to travel the world, he's saying... It's a rebuttal. A rebuttal to any suggestion that the denial of his past led to his failure or inability to thrive. Absolutely. The need to validate the past is inseparable from the need to prove his current self-worth. Right. If they acknowledge the shared history, they have to acknowledge the person who experienced it. And that person is now a successful businessman. The archive is proof of competence, of stability, of continued relevance. And the ultimate proof of his transparency comes when he gives a formal invitation and a physical address. He gives Naresh Sethi, sir, his detailed home address in Panchgula. And that is the absolute antithesis of digital blocking. It really is. While his classmates are using technology to create distance, both physical and digital, the narrator is offering maximum vulnerability and openness. He's saying, I'm not hiding. You know exactly where I am. If you claim I'm a liar, come here and confront me in my reality. It's such a powerful challenge to their chosen method of digital evasion. So let's pull all of this together. The source material strongly suggests that the narrator's self-respect is fundamentally anchored to the integrity and the public acknowledgment of his personal history. And if that history is denied, what is the ultimate emotional cost for him? Well, the emotional cost is the trauma of denial. When people who shared your lived experience deny that it happened, they are fundamentally undermining your ability to define your own reality. And for Gege Mago, the archive is a mechanism to combat that trauma. That's it. The persistence in seeking explicit acknowledgement, the polygraph demand, the cordless phone verification, it's all driven by this imperative that his existence, his experiences must be real. And only shared verification can provide that existential stability for him. This brings us back to the specific focus our listeners asked about. What kind of self-esteem or self-respect is guiding all of this? It's a self-respect that operates on an all or nothing principle. It cannot tolerate ambiguity or social compromise. It's like it's saying my worth is tied to my truth. If you deny my truth, you deny my worth. Yes. For the narrator, letting the classmates rewrite the past is the same as letting them negate his entire life experience and maybe even limit his spiritual path, like he references with Guruji. So the archive becomes a necessary, if painful, act of self-preservation against this social and metaphysical erasure. And we see the clear societal cost of that throughout the sources. The preservation of this absolute truth, this demand for historical integrity, it results directly in isolation. That's the paradox. It is. The classmates are blocking, denying, minimizing engagement. The narrator wins the battle of factual preservation. He gets Pankaj Mangal to remember the cordless phone, for example. But he loses the war for social harmony. Exactly. The more detailed his archive becomes, the more he isolates himself, which ironically forces him to rely even more heavily on that internal archive for the validation he can't get externally. It's a self-reinforcing loop. Denial leads to more archiving, which leads to more isolation. Which then necessitates even more detailed archiving to compensate for the lack of external validation. The archive becomes a fully self-contained system of proof. And that internal system is maintained, as the notes show, with a blend of historical facts, real-world status updates, and spiritual guidance. All fused together to defend the integrity of one person against a world that seems determined to forget him. Hashtag tag tag outro. This deep dive has offered a really stark look into the digital age's most intense personal conflicts. We've examined an individual who has devoted years to creating an undeniable historical record. And in doing so, fighting the collective digital power of denial that's being wielded by his former peers. A power he sees as not just social, but maybe even spiritual in nature. We've seen how self-respect can be so fundamentally intertwined with historical accuracy. The ability to document, to authenticate, and to publicly disclose becomes a moral necessity for him. Even when the cost is total social isolation, the archive is a powerful testament to the idea that some people will choose verified truth, no matter how painful, over a more frictionless, convenient oblivion. And it leaves us with a provocative thought about our own digital footprints. In an era where a shared history can just be wiped away with a block button or a profile deletion, who ultimately holds the power over a narrative? Is it the many who choose to forget their inconvenient past? Or is it the one who chooses to preserve every single specific and often painful detail, ensuring that the history and his self-worth remains authenticated and undeniable? Consider the memories you've shared with others, the facts you know to be true that those other witnesses might now prefer to ignore. Are you too maintaining an internal mental archive, waiting for the moment when that memory might need to be authenticated? Or is your piece purchased at the price of selective historical editing, something to mull over as you navigate your own shared but often contested past?

Reincarnations Dreams

NATIONALIST CONGRESS PARTY

NATIONALIST CONGRESS PARTY


Official Website of Nationalist Congress Party designed & hosted by King Vikramaditya-rebirth as Gagan Deep Maggo, Mob:+91-9501333111

Water crisis would worsen in near future, due to deteriorating environment conditions here.

Due to dwindling forest cover that has resulted in frequent droughts, floods and unexpected rise in the temperature.

Rising pollution level in Kashmir,Gulmarg has degraded the quality of air soil and water.

Right to equality in India is being abolished in Kashmir.Environmental deterioration is eventually endangering life of Kashmiris.

The Constitution (Forty Second Amendment) Act 1976 explicitly incorporated environmental protection and improvement as a part of state policy but trees are being uprooted.

The right to livelihood lost its battle to economic development in Gulmarg by cruel Indian Government.

Mother Earth Mother earth was born;
From the thousand sands;
One by one it combines;
And make the lands;
Adam and Eva was born at the thousand sand;
Act as the ancestor;Of the human kind;
Thousand sands are occupied;
By the human kind;
They pollute, they destroy;
As if they own the lands.
Mother earth is crying;
But humans are deaf;
Mother earth is dying;
But humans can’t hear nor feel.
Mother earth is begging for us to stop no more destroying nor polluting
love Mother earth like you love yourself


There is a government body called Delhi Pollution control committe existing in delhi called DPCC basically established for controlling pollution in this national capital region(DELHI).
I being an environment friendly citizen applied for a unit in prime industrial area of New Delhi only after installing and succesfully running the required systems for controlling pollution and treatment of Water.
The concerned department ie DPCC which became active sometimes and became natent most of the time, tortured me and my family continously for one and half year asking for clarifications for the reason for our application.
Inspite of giving all possible proofs to the department they made our consent application a big issue and keep on demanding huge amount of money from us which due to no other option we keep on giving them the amount whenever demanded from them.
Since I had refused them bribe when they had their first visit after the application,they were exploiting us all the time. In the mean time they were providing consents to the people which were not having systems for controlling pollution installed at their polluting units at a nominal bribe of 12000 This procedure of providing consent to operate polluting manufacturing units after getting bribe and not installing pollution control measures is till today's date ie.09-12-2007(World COrruption DAy) is kept on followed.
I complained this matter to CVC ( Central Vigilance commission ) and CBI( Central Beauru of Investigation) but of no use.
The member secretory Mrs.jaya seelan whose office is in secretariat building was continously abusing me with words i have never heard. She even was torturing me of what kind of science graduation i have attained in front of excise commissioner and then deputy commissioner of DPCC Mrs.Debashree Mukherjee. She was agreeing sometimes and abusing me and my family other time.
1) I had applied for a consent only when I had succesfully treated water continously for two years in Gagan Enterprises.
2) At the time of installation of the treatment plant , DPCC was not playing any active role in Delhi.
3) When I submitted my application form they tried to gramitacally figure out mistakes in that because at that time also they were recieving bribes from polluting units.
4) Even now there is no need to give you any media briefs for the kind and level of pollution in River Yamuna.
5) There are unlimited number of manufacturing units draining immense amount of UNTREATED water in Yamuna existing in Delhi.
6) Delhi face the threat of becoming a desert in the near future.
7) Ground water is being contaminated by toxic elements released by industrial untreated discharge. The disposal of industrial effluents into the Yamuna flood plain and water channels around Delhi, seepage through sewage dumps, agricultural waste, percolation of liquid wastes and general bad hygiene habits and poor sanitation provisions has led to this pollution.
8)Two decades ago Yamuna was a river,but what remains of it now is a sluggish flow laden with plastic,solid waste,untreated industrial water and corpses.
9)Japan Bank for International Co-operation extended a soft loan of Rs.700 crore for treating Yamuna.But due to collection of bribes by dpcc officials proprietors of industrial units are allowed to flush untreated water into sewer.
10)The biochemical oxygen demand(BOD),dissolved oxygen(DO) and colon bacillus colonies-three main parameters to gauge water quality-have worsened due to increasing corruption.
11)The courts are only concerned about removing encroachments and unauthorized colonies who discharge organic wastes.The untreated inorganic industrial effluents obviously make way into the river even if discharged by automatic machines or labours working in factories because industries are sources of huge bribe collection which fill pockets of jaya seelan also.
This criteria is not dependent on the place of residence of workers.
12) There is widespread pollution of Delhi's underground water system due to excessive seepage of toxic chemicals like arsenic, mercury and fluorides. This is not surprising when 19 industrial drains empty into the Yamuna flood plain alone.
13) The pollutants that have affected the environment of Delhi due to this uncontrolled seepage are nitrates, potassium, phosphates and heavy metals like cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, nickel, lead and zinc.
14)People of delhi are be exposed to chromium through breathing, eating or drinking and through skin contact with chromium or chromium compounds. The level of chromium in air and water is generally low. In drinking water the level of chromium is usually low as well, but contaminated well water may contain thedangerous chromium(IV); hexavalent chromium.For most people eating food that contains chromium(III) is the main route of chromium uptake, as chromium(III) occurs naturally in many vegetables, fruits, meats, yeasts and grains. Various ways of food preparation and storage may alter the chromium contents of food. When food in stores in steel tanks or cans chromium concentrations may rise.
Chromium(III) is an essential nutrient for humans and shortages may cause heart conditions, disruptions of metabolisms and diabetes. But the uptake of too much chromium(III) can cause health effects as well, for instance skin rashes.
Chromium(VI) is a danger to human health, mainly for people who work in the steel and textile industry. People who smoke tobacco also have a higher chance of exposure to chromium.
Chromium(VI) is known to cause various health effects. When it is a compound in leather products, it can cause allergic reactions, such as skin rash.
After breathing it in chromium(VI) can cause nose irritations and nosebleeds.Other health problems that are caused by chromium(VI) are:
- Skin rashes- Upset stomachs and ulcers- Respiratory problems- Weakened immune systems- Kidney and liver damage- Alteration of genetic material- Lung cancer- Death
The health hazards associated with exposure to chromium are dependent on its oxidation state. The metal form (chromium as it exists in this product) is of low toxicity. The hexavalent form is toxic. Adverse effects of the hexavalent form on the skin may include ulcerations, dermatitis, and allergic skin reactions. Inhalation of hexavalent chromium compounds can result in ulceration and perforation of the mucous membranes of the nasal septum,irritation of the pharynx and larynx, asthmatic bronchitis, bronchospasms andedema. Respiratory symptoms may include coughing and wheezing, shortness of breath, and nasal itch.
15)Nickel is not known to cause any health problems when people are exposed to it at levels above the MCL for relatively short periods of time.Nickel has the potential to cause the following effects from a lifetime exposure at levels above the MCL: decreased body weight; heart and liver damage; skin irritation.
16)Exposure occurs from lead's presence in air, food, water, soil, dustfall,paint, and other materials. Lead is readily absorbed by the body via the primary routes of entry, inhalation and ingestion. Studies indicate that 10% to 20% of inhaled lead enters the blood stream. In children, approximately 50% of ingested lead is absorbed as compared to 8% to 10% for adults. This is especially significant since much of children's lead exposure is caused by their normal habits of mouthing dirty hands, objects and materials.
Within the body, lead is found in circulating red blood cells, soft tissues(liver and kidney), and bone (where lead is accumulated). Blood lead concentrations are the most reliable indicator of recent lead exposure.Known health effects of lead poisoning include:
Anemia. Brain and nervous system damage, which can include permanent mental and motor retardation and in extreme cases, death. Severe kidney injury or failure. Injury to the gastrointestinal system and the heart. Damage to the reproductive system, including: Ovarian and testicular dysfunction. Impaired fetal blood synthesis, premature births, and other delivery complications.Long-term, low level lead exposure causes learning deficits and behavioral problems in children. The major source to children is through contact with the dust or chips from old lead-containing paint. However, significant airborne exposure may occur near manufacturing facilities emitting large amounts of lead.
At present, a child with blood lead levels over 10 micrograms per deciliter (µg/dl) is considered lead-poisoned. Exposure to air containing 1 µg/m3 of lead is associated with a 5 µg/dl increase in blood lead; thus, long-term exposure to air containing over 2 µg/m3 could cause a child to become lead-poisoned.
Recent studies suggest that lead may be a factor in high blood pressure and subsequent heart disease in middle-aged white males.
Effects on Plants and AnimalsAt common low ambient concentrations lead does not usually pose a threat to plants and animals. However, exposure to high concentrations has adversely affected domestic animals, wildlife, and aquatic life. Areas near major emission sources are most susceptible.
16)Water is polluted with zinc, due to the presence of large quantities of zinc in the wastewater of industrial plants in Delhi.This wastewater is not purified and thereb resulting further increase of pollution in delhi.One of the consequences is that yamuna is depositing zinc-polluted sludge on their banks. Zinc may also increase the acidity of waters.Some fish can accumulate zinc in their bodies, when they live in zinc-contaminated waterways. When zinc enters the bodies of these fish it is able to bio magnify up the food chain.
Large quantities of zinc can be found in soils. When the soils of farmland are polluted with zinc, animals will absorb concentrations that are damaging to their health. Water-soluble zinc that is located in soils can contaminate groundwater.
Zinc cannot only be a threat to cattle, but also to plant species. Plants often have a zinc uptake that their systems cannot handle, due to the accumulation of zinc in soils.
On zinc-rich soils only a limited number of plants has a chance of survival. That is why there is not much plant diversity near zinc-disposing factories.
Due to the effects upon plants zinc is a serious threat to the productions of farmlands. Despite of this zinc-containing manures are still applied.
Finally, zinc can interrupt the activity in soils, as it negatively influences the activity of microrganisms and earthworms. The breakdown oforganic matter may seriously slow down because of this.
17) Around 1393 mld of sewerage finds its way into river Yamuna through 19 major drains. Out falling into the river carrying 218 mls which includes 48 mgd of industrial effluent. BOD content of this water is 587 mld in all the 5 sewerage zones of Delhi. 64% of total BOD is from domestic sources. 10-15% of nutrients added to the soils through fertilizers eventually find their surface water system. The highest load occurs from the NCT Delhi (about 152 MT/day of BOD load) as compared to the loads of other cities which vary from 1 mt/day) as per Yamuna Action Plan. Everyday about 1880 mld of waste water is discharge into the river from Delhi through 18 drains. More than 95% waster water in Delhi is drained by 5 drains viz. Nazafgarh, Sen Nursing home, and power house drain.
18) The 48 km stretch of the Yamuna River in Delhi is heavily polluted by domestic and industrial wastewater.
19) Chemical contamination will lead to the spread of many lethal diseases like cancer in the near future.
20) There are 28 industrial areas in Delhi. Most of the small and tiny industries do not have individual facilities to treat liquid waste.
21) The alarming rise in chemical pollution last year too and consumption by humans is likely to cause a number of diseases. This process is never checked due to money and favour collection by Delhi Pollution Control Committe all the time they visit polluted industries. It is well-known that cadmium contamination causes anaemia, high blood pressure, liver trouble and hepatic and renal disorders. Nickel causes pneumonia, lung and nose cancer, headache nausea and vomiting. Lead may cause gastric problems, kidney diseases and nervous disorders. Zinc is toxic to plants.
22) The air pollution in delhi has also increased rapidly.
23) Children have narrower airways than do adults. Thus, irritation or inflammation caused by air pollution that would produce only a slight response in an adult can result in a potentially significant obstruction of the airways in a young child. During exercise, children, like adults, breathe with both their nose and mouth rather than just their noses. When the nose is bypassed during the breathing process, the filtering effects of the nose are lost, therefore allowing more air pollution to be inhaled.
24)Sulfur dioxide not only has a bad odor, it can irritate the respiratory system. Exposure to high concentrations for short periods of time can constrict the bronchi and increase mucous flow, making breathing difficult.
Children, the elderly, those with chronic lung disease, and asthmatics are especially susceptible to these effects. Sulfur dioxide can also: Immediately irritate the lung and throat at concentrations greater than 6parts per million (ppm) in many people. Impair the respiratory system's defenses against foreign particles and bacteria, when exposed to concentrations less than 6 ppm for longer time periods. Apparently enhance the harmful effects of ozone. (Combinations of the twogases at concentrations occasionally found in the ambient air appear to increase airway resistance to breathing.)
Sulfur dioxide tends to have more toxic effects when acidic pollutants, liquid or solid aerosols, and particulates are also present.Effects are more pronounced among mouth breathers, e.g., people who are exercising or who have head colds. These effects include: Health problems, such as episodes of bronchitis requiring hospitalizationassociated with lower-level acid concentrations. Self-reported respiratory conditions, such as chronic cough and difficult breathing, associated with acid aerosol concentrations. (Asthmatic individuals are especially susceptible to these effects. The elderly and those with chronic respiratory conditions may also be affected at lower concentrations than the general population.)
Increased respiratory tract infections, associated with longer term, lower-level exposures to SO2 and acid aerosols. Subjective symptoms, such as headaches and nausea, in the absence of pathologicalabnormalities, due to long-term exposure.
Effects on PlantsSulfur dioxide easily injures many plant species and varieties, both native and cultivated. Some of the most sensitive plants include various commercially valuable pines, legumes, red and black oaks, white ash, alfalfa and blackberry. The effects include: Visible injury to the most sensitive plants at exposures as low as 0.12 ppm for 8 hours. Visible injury to many other plant types of intermediate sensitivity at exposures of 0.30 ppm for 8 hours. Positive benefits from low levels, in a very few species growing on sulfur deficient soils.
Other EffectsIncreases in sulfur dioxide concentrations accelerate the corrosion of metals, probably through the formation of acids. (SO2 is a major precursor to acidic deposition.) Sulfur oxides may also damage stone and masonry, paint,various fibers, paper, leather, and electrical components.
Increased SO2 also contributes to impaired visibility. Particulate sulfate,much of which is derived from sulfur dioxide emissions, is a major component of the complex total suspended particulate mixture.
25) Diesel cars in 2006 represent nearly 20% of new car registrations in Delhi, up from 4% in 1999. While gasoline cars have increased at 8.5% annually, diesel cars have maintained a growth rate of 16.6%. It is shocking to note that diesel cars during the same period have increased by 425 per cent. The share of diesel cars, a mere 4 per cent of the total new car registration in 1999, has climbed to nearly 20 per cent in 2006. While petrol cars have increased at 8.5 per cent annually, diesel cars have maintained a growth rate of 16.6 per annum," the release added The cumulative effect is overwhelming the emissions benefits gained by the city's earlier phase-out of its 12,000 diesel buses. It is calculated that the 118,631 diesel cars on the city's roads are equivalent to adding particulate emissions from nearly 30,000 diesel buses. NOx levels are steadily rising.
26) Nine of every twenty residents suffer from lung, liver or genetic disorders due to highly-polluted air in the capital city of 16 million. It has been found that polluted air has also altered immunity and caused blood-related abnormalities among many of the victims

Permissible limits suitable for drinking water is as follows:
(mg/l)
Cu 0.05
Fe 0.1
NO3 45
F 1.0
Zn 0.05
SO4 200
Ca 75
Mg 30
Mn 200
Hg 0.01
Cd 0.005
As 0.05
Pb 0.01
Cr 0.05
Ni 0.02
Hardness 2mg/l
pH 7-8.5
The levels of manganese, copper,mickel,chromium,iron selenium,lead,arsenic,mercury and cadmium are marginally above the Indian Standards (IS) specification regulated for drinking water
27) There is serious problems with the extremely poor monitoring capacities of government agencies because they collect bribe and so give wrong data and also the information they generate is broadly indicative.
28) The way the government,the courts and Mrs.Jaya Seelan are proceeding, it is clear that the intention is not to fight pollution.
29) I had closed Gagan Enterprises in April 2004 itself.
30) DPCC and any environment groups in India only want media attention and no more devoted towards controlling pollution.
31) If I was right in controlling pollution then the reasons for my application were also righteous,this means I was tortured. If I was wrong in the decision for application,this is sure DPCC is not acting even today,because consents are being provided to polluting units in delhi after getting bribes,Then also Human Right Commission should pay at least some attention to my complaint and do whatever is suitable to the greatest authority in this earth,to become true to your lord.
32) There is a difference between long term remedies and short temporary meastures for controlling pollution.
33) Dpcc is not following any of the above procedures because they are able to gather bribe from polluting units which thereby flourish more and thus polluting more.I being surviving in the same system along with maintaing huge expenses for pollution control devices and also giving bribes was not able to run that factory.
34) The products manufactured in delhi are consumed in other states also.
35)The eligibility or intention of owner of any unit is the only criteria which is responsible for the methods that company employ in controlling pollution.
36)This factor is not dependent on geographic location of the polluting unit.Simply relocating industries means relocating pollution from the backyard of Delhi's elite to wherever human life can be found to be cheaper
37) My first claim is that inspite of relocating the polluting units,there should be ban on indivisuals to open any manufacturing unit whether polluting or not; in any area. If ohchr is ready to send me details of proofs required to show and proove my complaints i can send that through any medium and also through courier.
38) As I had already mentioned due to the torture faced by me when I was operating an industry in which all the pollution control measures were installed and succesfully being used continously for treatment and purification of water and air; for not giving bribe too often,I had to face more hassles and torture, I closed that unit in march 2004.
39)Now I opened an Electronic Goods showroom in september 2004.
40) For no reason DDA officials visited this premises and told me that we are there to enchourage youngsters and we dont require small amount of bribe.
41)Since they dont use the exact words to demand money and talk like demanding gifts which is much a common way of harrasing and collecting bribe in delhi, and also I was in no mood to give bribe because of fewer resources and also less daily expenditure money I can utilise at any moment of time.
42)They(A Government Organisation) are again ready to exploit me and my family by demanding more and more money.
43) IF GOVERNMENT AGENCIES DON'T HAVE ENOUGH LAWS TO PUNISH AND FINE ANYONE WORKING IN THIS CITY,THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOURAGE AND HARASS THEM BY SENDING INAPPROPRIATE AND INCOMPLETE NOTICES THAT CANNOT BE IMPONDED ON THEM, JUST BECAUSE THEY NEED MORE BRIBE.
44)I am explaining below two more domestic remedies I have tried to exploit as advised by you.
1)Government of Delhi Grievance Cell Complaint No. CMO/PGC/2006/515174
2)Supreme Court Of India Reference No. 1056(Civil Appeal) dt.12-03-2006
Gagan Deep MaggoReferences G/SO 215/1(human rights commission)